Did you think the role of a Special Prosecutor was to prosecute?
Seems that DA Bradley of Sauk County missed the point in, once again, letting David Prosser off the hook.
She was not appointed as a Special District Attorney; to determine whether a case should be brought to trial, but a Special Prosecutor to bring forth evidence to Prosecute David Prosser for a physical attack in the workplace that would have gotten any other worker in any other work place fired. I’m no lawyer but when a Special Prosecutor was appointed, I was relieved that the wrong doers would finally come to trial, and was shocked at her unwillingness or inability to take the matter to court. After weeks of investigation, and interviews, why is the decision to prosecute this outrageous behavior in Wisconsin’s highest court left in the hands of a single County District Attorney acting as Judge and Jury?
How to Unseat Prosser
What hangs over David Prosser like a choke hold, is all of the suspicious allegations surrounding his whereabouts, role, and actions over the past months, that have been covered up, dismissed, or ignored in a way that leads to the question: Who is protecting him? Who is hiding what…and why?
Apparently, friends in high places are about to push another instance of this man’s irrational and highly questionable behavior under the rug. How else can one explain his escape from any punishment for actions, that you or I would be dismissed, demoted, or fired for?
The Dominos Will Fall
Clearly, this man needs to be sanctioned, charged, and unseated, but relying on the people in high places promises to be a dead end. Yet, the original sin remains under investigation. He retained his seat on the court through an election that resulted in a recount and an association with one, Kathy Nickolaus who “found” him the 14,000 votes to hold his seat. Documented evidence of election fraud was observed, reported and documented during the recount. It is here, back at the beginning, back with the evidence surrounding Kathy Nickolaus and the Spring Supreme Court Election, where the path to unseat Prosser can be found.
Here, under the Election Fraud rug,
Front to back Prosser, Walker, Kathy Nickolaus, Fitzgerald, Kevin Kennedy, Van Hollen, Darling
lies the evidence just waiting to be revealed to the light. You see, it never has been. This evidence is not in the hands of the people in high places. It is in the hands of ordinary concerned citizens who volunteered time, energy, and analysis to observe and document it.
The path to unseat Prosser is not to empower the people in high places…but to empower the people by exposing the evidence they gathered.
The privileged and powerful are protected and play by different rules than the citizens they serve.
The GAB, Sheriff’s Department, or Judicial Commission need only announce that they are conducting an “investigation” and the suspects are off the hook. Any inquiries, or questions for detail are simply met with a “no comment the matter is under investigation”. This secrecy would not be held if you attacked someone in your work place, or if your child were caught cheating on a test. Why are the privileged and powerful granted a special privilege of secrecy that you or I would never get?
But, oh, there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence to warrant a full investigation.
1) The post election meeting Prosser had with Walker to which Prosser has given three different responses on three different days: a) It didn’t happen b) I might have met him in the hall c) I don’t think I went to the Capitol that day. Which is the truth?
2) Walker’s response to the press when Prosser trailed by 200 votes, that a recount would be fair unless a bunch of votes turns up somewhere. One day later they did turn up in Brookfield. Was this a slip of revealing what he already knew?
3) The GAB announced that it was conducting an investigation of Kathy Nickolaus and her methods of counting the Waukesha vote, shortly after she made her “human error” public; the error that found 14,000 votes that put Prosser comfortably in the lead and ultimately the victor of the Supreme Court election. The latest update of progress on this investigation by the GAB, which was to be published by the end of June, is that they cannot acknowledge whether the action is on going or when, if ever, it will be complete, because the formal complaint by Kloppenburg has imposed new confidentiality restrictions that apply under state law and prevent any comment.
For more and more evidence of election fraud in Waukesha See “Election Merry-go-Round”
If you want to unseat Prosser demand the circumstantial evidence gathered during the Supreme Court Recount be addressed. Tell a friend. Tell an editor. Only the people will unseat Prosser.