John Doe – What happened June 5, 2012 between 8 & 9 p.m.?

Investigating the Walker Recall ELection

At some tick of time between the hour of 8 and 9 p.m. on June 5, 2012 – there was a shock, a surprise, a shift in human reality across the State of Wisconsin.

For some it was a flow of elation, for others it was closer to hearing the news that your dad or your dog just died. Regardless of the emotional spasm of the moment and beyond all the political bluster, the abrupt “call” of the governor’s race was not expected by most. Not Walker supporters. Not Barrett supporters. The word on the street was to hunker in for a long night of nail biting and up and down pacing while following the returns of a close election.

On election day, the hopes of Barrett supporters were lifted to learn of the high turn out numbers, which generally bode well for Democrats. Walker supporters had seen poll numbers close in the days before the election and feared their Wauwatosa boy wonder might be toppled.

What Just happened?

The “What just happened?”diebold moment was the most common bipartisan experience since Scott Walker took office. Something strange happened. It happened to Republicans in the Racine Senate race, it happened to Democrats in the Gubernatorial race. What the heck happened?

“What just happened” was not pretty. It was a bipartisan realization, as deep as string theory, that the people were no longer in control.

Somehow, in the hour between 8 and 9 p.m., citizen confidence in their vote was punched in the gut. Somehow, technology and the media had trumped a process that forms the very basis of the American way of life – our vote.

The simple process that began with marking an “X” on a slip of paper and sliding it into a slot, had become a complex system of computer programing filled with words like “PROMPACKS (congaing both EPROM and RAM memory) for Optech ballots scanners, PCMICA memory cards for the M-series scanners (e.g. M100, M150, and M650), Compact flash memory for the TSX touch screen, SD memory for the AutoMark, etc.” (Quote from the page [Fraud “IT”] above).

The results of this algorithmic total are statistically predicted, well in advance of any complete or final tally, by exit polls compiled by major news organizations. In the case of the Recall election, the governor’s race was called while people were still standing in line and waiting to vote! Never mind that real people were still voting. Not important. The news moguls were in competition for the “first to call” status. ABC won! WOW! NBC followed shortly thereafter.

Conflicting early reports

Update 9:50 pm EST: NBC News is now reporting that Walker will win the recall election. With 21 percent of precincts in Walker is currently winning 61%-38%. Barrett’s strongest counties are still largely not reporting, but the projection is being made based on a combination of exit poll and early results which have come in. ABC WON! WOW! They called the election for Walker shortly after

Update 9:09 pm EST: Fox News now joins the chorus, reporting a race that is “too close to call” at this time.

Update 9:06 pm EST: Chuck Todd of NBC News says their exit poll data indicates a “coin flip” as to who will win.

Update 9:03 pm EST: CNN’s exit poll has a 50-50 split of the vote between Barrett and Walker.

Update 9:00 pm EST: Polls have now closed, but again those currently in line will still be allowed to vote. MSNBC is now calling the race “too close to call” at this time.

CNN Election Updates SORRY the link is “no longer available”.

MILWAUKEE | Tue Jun 5, 2012 9:42pm EDT

(Reuters) – Exit polls show the Wisconsin recall election on Tuesday is essentially tied between Republican Governor Scott Walker and Democratic challenger Tom Barrett, CNN said.

The CNN data is based on interviews with voters after they cast ballots and not on actual results.

ABC WON Everyone else LOST

It is clear to the Supreme Court that ABC is a “person” who is more important than the late night voter standing in line determined to vote, but something even more insidious is working in the back rooms with locked doors where exit polls are tallied and altered. Yes…altered. They don’t use the word “altered” they call them “adjusted exit polls”

How are they altered or adjusted, Richard Charnin explains:

Walker Recall: The Exit Pollster’s MO Never Changes

Richard Charnin
June 9, 2012

The exit pollster’s MO never changes. In the recall, the pundits said it was “too close to call”. I’m quite sure that Barrett was winning, but the media knew the fix was in so they had to keep it close. They knew the actual exit poll numbers would not see the light of day. But they sure called it quickly for Walker, didn’t they?

The pollster’s have had plenty of experience in adjusting exit polls to match the vote count.

In 2004, preliminary state exit poll numbers were downloaded from the CNN website by Jonathan Simon. Kerry led by 50-48%. The state polls were already in the process of being matched to the recorded vote. But Bush was winning the vote count – a massive divergence from the exit polls.

We later learned that Kerry led the National Exit Poll from 4pm to midnight. At 4pm (8349 respondents) he led by 51-48%. At 730 pm (11027 respondents) by 51-48%. At 1222am (13047) by 51-47%. But we didn’t see these numbers. They were not meant for public viewing.

The next day, the CNN and NYT websites showed that Bush won the National Exit Poll (13660) by 51-48% – matching the recorded vote. How did the final 613 National Exit Poll respondents enable Bush to flip the vote? The exit pollsters never could answer that one. After all, the flip was mathematically impossible.

The unadjusted 2004 exit polls (state and national) were not released until about a year ago, long after the damage was done. And guess what? Kerry actually won the 13660 respondents! He had 7064 (51.7%), Bush 6414 (47.0%), Other 182 (1.3%).

Someday, probably in 2022, we’ll get to see the unadjusted recall exit poll numbers. In the meantime, here’s the 2004 National Exit Poll Timeline that was “not meant for public viewing”.

Adjusted Exit Polls

Covert Corporate (Persons) also Tabulate your vote – IN SECRET

Another more serious crack in the glass ceiling of denial split the surface in that hour between 8 and 9 pm on June 5. The part of the exit poll that was NOT adjusted didn’t make any sense. More people left the polls saying they supported Obama then Walker by 51-44%. Yet, Walker won. Read “Walker Recall Vote IMPOSSIBLE

We are still suffering from the backlash of the economic strain caused by Wall Street Greed. Do you think that elections are free of this same insatiable thirst for wealth and power? If 36 million dollars are invested in getting your vote on the front side of the election, don’t you think millions are available to steal your vote on the back side? Oh, there was plenty o’ cash available in Wisconsin. The recall was set up as a push against Obama by such players as Karl Rove.

The GOP is pretty sure that whatever happens is a precursor to how the state — and more blue collar worker states – will fare come the general election. “Karl Rove….argues that the results of Walker’s recall election and the margin of the vote will offer the first genuine clues as to whether Wisconsin’s political environment is similar to four years ago or has reverted to the nail-biter status of 2000 and 2004. ‘This will give a very clear indication of whether Wisconsin and the industrial Midwest will be up for grabs this year,’ Rove said.

Wisconsin Bellweather

Could your vote be bought?…EASY

When a state election plays out on the stage of national politics can you imagine how much money is available to “spread around”? But how could anyone manage to buy your vote without getting caught? Simple answer: There is no oversight of any kind. Voting Machine vendors like Command Central, who supply all the equipment, programming, and tabulation of your vote, do it in secret; without any oversight from any government agency, elected official, or branch of the judiciary. None. Does this remind you of the housing boom and Wall Street bankers in 2008?

The Classic “Divide and Conquer” Paradigm

The division between conservative and liberal or Republican and Democrat has never been more clearly divisive. The secrecy of vote machine vendors like Command Central(V.P. Larry Zins pictured left) is protected as the two sides are so focused on their opposing agendas, they dismiss or ignore the companies that count the vote secretly. Both parties fear launching recounts or investigations into the secret workings of these companies and view such actions as a political liability; that they will be viewed as a force who wants to destroy voter confidence and the American way of life. Yet, just as in the years before the Wall Street buyout, the opposite is true.

So we wait for the a new Fighting Bob. We look for a savvy politician with determination and courage to break through the denial, and to stand on the stump to declare, “Our most fundamental freedom, our vote, is threatened by lack of transparency, and secrecy that is intolerable under any constitution”. Meanwhile, it is just us. We the people of Wisconsin. We the people…period.

More and more citizens are becoming aware that our system of voting in Wisconsin is a mess and largely due to long 30 year tenure of Kevin Kennedy as the Administrator of the Government Accountability Board. read “Calling for the resignation of Kevin Kennedy

Some concerned citizens launched an effort to audit the vote of the Recall election to compare the digital machine totals to the ballots.(You may be surprised to learn that this comparison is not done unless there is an official recount, in fact, it is against the law to compare the paper trail to the digital machine count on the night of the election.) Unfortunately, the effort was fumbled by the group Wisconsin WAVE who arrived to spear head the effort without enough experience or skill to carry it through. WAVE has yet to account for the money collected for the recall audit or to provide any accounting for the abysmal failure of the effort.

Other citizens working independently of WAVE did audit votes in select wards in Madison and Milwaukee. At least one audit in Madison did suggest a possible flip of the vote.

Nobody knows…Everybody knows

Not one day, not one hour has passed since Scott Walker began his campaign for governor when a secret John Doe Investigation has not been active. Nobody knows exactly who or what might be the specific target or targets of the new and expanded version of John Doe.

Everybody knows…

Secret probe spreads to five Wisconsin counties
Possible violations during recall elections among issues

Daniel Bice – No Quarter – Oct. 21, 2013

A former top-level assistant U.S. attorney has been appointed a special prosecutor in a burgeoning, secret investigation into a wide variety of state issues, including possible campaign violations during the recent recall elections, multiple sources said.

Francis Schmitz — who spent nearly 30 years as a federal prosecutor and was once a finalist for U.S. attorney in Milwaukee — is leading the widespread John Doe probe, according to sources.

Nobody knows…

Nobody knew the specifics of the investigation when it was focused in Milwaukee. Nobody knows the specifics of the bigger and wider investigation now in progress.

Just as nobody knows what happened between 8 and 9 p.m. on July 5 of 2012.

Advertisements

Wisconsin Vote – Wave or Dry Well?

Wisconsin WAVE takes over and drops the ball


Did Walker really win the recall election? We will never know.

The video is from Thom Hartman posted June 12; wave4shortly after the June 5, 2012 recall election. It is cued up to a point of interest in that Wisconsin Wave is identified:

The grassroots organization which includes The Wisconsin Wave has formed to verify the accuracy and integrity of the election results.

Thom goes on to discuss the citizen observers who were in place in Racine. The obvious implication is that WAVE had a major hand in the observation – not true. In fact, WAVE came onto the scene in the final moments of the election integrity game saying, “Coach, give me the ball!”. The promise was to organize and finance an investigation of the recall election ballots statewide and score a touch down. Wave fumbled and lost the game. We will never know if Scott Walker was the real winner of the recall election.

WAVE splashed in like a Tsunami to commandeer the election integrity movement and then proceeded to collect money with the promise of auditing the Barrett/Walker recall election – after 14 months, WAVE has yet to report on any of the vote recounts administered. WAVE has never accounted for the money raised from citizens “to help with the recall audit” through the ever present DONATE
DONATE
DONATE

This is the message that accompanied every post, article, and picture in the weeks following the June 5 recall election:

Click here to stay in touch with us about upcoming events and volunteer opportunities, and please consider helping us cover the costs associated with this grassroots effort by making a tax-deductable donation here.
…Wave partnered with groups like the Election Defense Alliance to organize election monitoring activities before, during, and after the recall elections this August. In total we mobilized several hundred volunteers and monitored polls in over 25 wards throughout the eight senate districts where recall elections took place.
WAVE – No More Stolen Elections

Meanwhile activists NOT working under WAVE produced results

Many election integrity activists had been communicating since the Prosser/Kloppenberg Supreme Court election (April 5, 2011). When they discovered that WAVE was requiring volunteers to sign a confidentiality agreement to participate in the recount, they struck out on their own.

The ISTHMUS covers Hand Count Votes Now!
July 19, 2012

Mary Magnuson, an electoral reform activist, submitted an open records request to the Madison city clerk on June 14 asking to inspect “any and all ballots,” including optical scanned ballots and absentee ballots, that were cast in Wards 16, 19, 39, 40 and 100 in the recall election against Gov. Scott Walker. She also asked to inspect the tapes used in the scanners and any inspectors’ reports prepared by poll workers.

Read Recall Hand Count Suggest Flip

Read: Barb With was volunteering as an observer at the Surpeme Court election Waukesha recount when she made a glaring discovery. The poll tape that was being counted and matched for votes cast in the April 5 election for Supreme Court Justice was dated March 30, 2011.

Dennis Kern, Marianne Moonhouse, and John Washburn discovered that the cartridges, holding the digital ballot count, were not held and secured in many County Clerk offices. By Wisconsin statute, all election materials are to be kept secure for public viewing for 10 days, but many counties sent them back, out of the State, to the Minnesota vendor Command Central. The team set up an email network to monitor messages of County Clerks, and Marrianne logged the info received into spreadsheets. (John Washburn is also the author of “the Fraud it” page above: “A description of the programing levels of your vote from any machine to certification”.)

Command Central Penalizes Crawford County $12,400 July 14, 2012
In Crawford County, when the cartridges were returned it was discovered it would cost $12,400 to view the information. According to Command Central, once the digital information on the cartridges was read they would need to be destroyed. Replacement costs would be $12,000 for which Crawford County tax payers would be liable.

Email from Crawford County Clerk Giesler:

I am sorry that you feel that your open records request has been denied. I do disagree with this statement in that I have tried very diligently to satisfy your request. Because you feel that you have been denied, the voting machine cartridges cannot be returned and will remain in my vault. The taxpayers of Crawford County must now incur costs of $12,400 so that all new cartridges can be burned for the August primary election. I will be providing the Crawford County Independent with the costs for the cartridges as they have requested this information.

The FOIA asking review of election materials was rescinded.

Wisconsin WAVE has yet to report

The only report of any recall findings from Wisconsin Wave recounts (they refer to the counts as “an investigation”) were summarized in a email to members and volunteers some weeks after the election. No official report to the public or press has ever been released by Wisconsin Wave.

What we have found so far includes:
Inconsistent and tamper-prone methods of securing ballot bags
Widespread use of unverifiable touch screen machines in a state where these devices are officially designated as handicap accessible equipment only
And most disturbingly, a number of counties where our hand-counts of paper optiscan ballots often differed from election night totals.

To complete this vital campaign we need your support right now!

Sincerely,

Adam Porton
National Director
[The “Donate” button above has been disabled for good reason]

The email goes on to say:

“Finishing up counts in other high priority counties where discrepancies have been found. The bigger our data set, the more complete our picture of these problems will be.
Compiling what percentage of Wisconsin voters used unverifiable touch-screen voting machines. Unbelievably, this information is not compiled by the state election authority, and so normally is not available to the public (or anyone for that matter).

Whatever happened to the money?

Wisconsin Wave is not listed on the Wisconsin Department of Revenue list as a non-profit organization under its own name. Wave is publicly associated with “The Liberty Tree Foundation” which appears to serve as an umbrella for Wave collections. “Liberty Tree Foundation for the Democratic Revolution, Inc.” is listed and the form 990 of income and expenditures for “Liberty Tree” is public record and can be found at by inputting the “Liberty Tree” in a search engine at: Guidestar.org

The form 990 shows the contributions, gifts, grants, and similar amounts received as $138,791 from July 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2012. The recall election was on June 5, so contributions to that effort would be reflected in the period from before the election thru June 30.

The total revenue (line 9) is reported at $150,369.

In Part III

The only entry describing the organization’s program accomplishments is “Civil rights, social advocacy and action programs, provide support to pro democracy campaigns in the form of policy research, publications, legal assistance, consultive services, and the convening of pro-democracy organizers. Total expenditure: $166,792 (No further breakdown describes any reference to election integrity of election investigation)

In part IV, one salary is reported to Benjamin Manski of $25,205 plus $5,593 in benefits.

Further on at Schedule “0” the larger expenditures are for “travel” $10,639 and “web” at $17,390.

Ben Manski and Adam Porton did not return calls placed to clarify the form 990 information.

Two basic questions must be answered by WAVE/Liberty Tree Foundation

How much money was collected by WAVE/Liberty Tree to investigate the June 5, 2012 recall election and, since no public report of any findings discovered through the audit/investigation was produced, how were the collected funds used?

A new election season is approaching and election integrity activists are in disarray due to the lack of transparency, incompetence, and irresponsibility in public reporting left in wake of the WAVE’s recall investigation. Grass roots organizations, hoping to develop new strategies to insure integrity in the 2014 election cycle, remain disoriented and confused by the past promises and actions taken on by WAVE. Experienced people and groups, who have been working to expose the real problems with machine voting since 2011 with a documented history of progress, are left struggling in the wake of the WAVE’s problematic entrance on the scene. WAVE needs to come forward to account for its funding and findings, or the suffer the consequences when the 2014 election cycle passes without organized strategies to protect the vote.






Please visit my “other blog” for news of my new play “House of Monkeys” – a musical romp through the love, life, and work of Moliere!

12 Days till the Nightmare: "WHO WON?"

Prediction – You are about to witness the revelation of a disaster
Never in American history have more people been more aware that computers called vote machines can be hacked and manipulated to flip votes.

The learning curve at play has bent slowly over the past decade, but the arc has continued to bend toward truth and transparency

Harper’s Magazine broke a cover story by Victoria Collier with just two words on the cover “How to Rig an Election”. The line of books at the right have all been published in the recent past. Each book, including the “Harper’s” article, all have one thing in common WISCONSIN! (The picture right features the October “Harper’s” edition)

Wisconsin serves the country

All of the authors of the publications on the right have found a home for discussion, and planning strategies in Wisconsin through a half dozen face book groups that have cropped up since the Spring Supreme Court election of 2011 when Kathy Nicholaus “found” the 14,000 votes to change the election results two days after the election. It is through the work of hundreds of people who contributed to the conversation about the huge problems with vote machines and how bureaucratic hand sitting has allowed a few private corporations to continue to steal votes and flip elections, that the learning curve has been bent toward truth and transparency.

Big SECRET will hit the fan. Be prepared!

This election appears to be close enough for election fraud to have effect with polls showing leads within the margin of error. The skeletons of secrecy are about to come out of the closet to be paraded by the awakened election integrity activists across the jumbo TV screens of the media who have ignored the most blatant vulnerability in the history of Democracy.

FACT: The computer systems called vote machines that count the vast majority of ballots in the U.S.A. are supplied by a few private corporations. These few corporate entities write the programming for these machines with no real oversight of any independent government agency, elected official. No one outside the secret sanctum of the corporation is allowed to see the programming code used to count your vote.

While We Still Have Time
Sheila Parks, Ed. D.

Wisconsin Democracy in Our Hands

“I cannot watch enough videos of the people in Wisconsin as you bold, brave, most decent Wisconsinites are out in the streets – resisting, doing non-violent civil disobedience/direct action, dissenting, protesting, rising up, standing up to and speaking and singing truth to power…”

This book deals with how we are losing our votes because of the fraud of electronic voting machines. While We Still Have Time, we must now stop using all electronic voting machines in our elections and instead now move to publicly observed, secure hand-counted paper ballots(HCPB) elections.
Get the book now on Amazon

Steal This Book, Not My Vote
Barbara With

Now available as a PDF eBook
for only $4.97.

This PDF has links to over 100 videos, news stories and blogs that support the evidence of a hostile corporate takeover of our state, and includes my RICO complaint filed with the US Department of Justice in August 2011.

Based on my experiences on the front lines of Wisconsin government for the past 18 months, as well as contributions from members of the Wisconsin Citizens Media Coop, STEAL tells the true story behind the story of the takeover of the United States as it is playing out in Wisconsin, and what we can do to stand strong for democracy.

Get the e book. NOW!

Proving Election Fraud
Richard Charnin

The media immediately rejected the exit polls that showed Kerry winning. After all, they said, Bush had a three million vote “mandate”; a massive conspiracy to fix the election could not be kept secret. Of course, we later learned that the vote counts could have been the work of a handful of individuals. Read “Proving Election Fraud” NOW

November is destined to present historical anomalies. Know what to watch for. Be Prepared.

WAVE and/or Liberty Tree Secrecy and Incompetance

Four months ago The Wave announced an audit of the June 5 Recall Election

Posted August 16 “The WAVE’s John Doe Investigation of Your Vote”

An organization called The Wave is conducting an audit of the vote count in the June 5 Recall Election – Oh…it is a secret, just like the target of the John Doe investigation. In the case of The Wave audit – the secrecy is self imposed for little good reason other than not allowing details of anomalies to be made public before a time the leaders see fit. The Wave’s self imposed secrecy works to the detriment of the stated goal, since the light at the end of the tunnel of any findings of anomalies is to demonstrate how our current system offers voters no transparency. Yet, the Wave chooses to operate in a veil of secrecy every bit as suspect, closed, and proprietary as the process they hope to defeat!

The Audit is NOT a John Doe Investigation

The target is known; to verify the vote against the certified count. There is no power to grant immunity in the “investigation”. The expectation of accountability for donated funds is just as important in the audit effort as any other publicly supported cause. The decision to frame the “audit” as an “investigation” , and therefore, rationalize holding any results until the “said investigation” is complete, belongs to the operatives of the Wave. By the time the information is gotten together in an appropriate manner for public scrutiny, chances are, no one will care.

Read The WAVE’s John Doe Investigation of Your Vote

Somehow “The Wave” morphed into “The Liberty Tree Foundation”


The new morphed organization sent out an email on September 19

Two months ago Liberty Tree’s Wisconsin Wave project began an historic hand-count of ballots from the June 5th gubernatorial recall election.

What we have found so far includes:
Inconsistent and tamper-prone methods of securing ballot bags
Widespread use of unverifiable touch screen machines in a state where these devices are officially designated as handicap accessible equipment only
And most disturbingly, a number of counties where our hand-counts of paper optiscan ballots often differed from election night totals.

To complete this vital campaign we need your support right now!
(The “Donate” button above has been disabled for good reason)
Sincerely,

Adam Porton
National Director

The email goes on to say:

“Finishing up counts in other high priority counties where discrepancies have been found. The bigger our data set, the more complete our picture of these problems will be.
Compiling what percentage of Wisconsin voters used unverifiable touch-screen voting machines. Unbelievably, this information is not compiled by the state election authority, and so normally is not available to the public (or anyone for that matter).”s

After months NOTHING NEW

Thanks, but we knew all of this.

People working outside the Liberty Wave Tree discovered these anomalies, conducted recounts, and painstakingly examined spread sheets, while Liberty Wave Tree would not share a shred of information on the audit or even the logistics; in which county or on what day they were scheduled to count ballots. As a result of the veil of secrecy people have been working at cross purposes.

You will notice that the email is worded with all the finesse of a professional fund raiser and punctuated by the ever present “Donate” button. Yet, the Liberty Wave Tree has never publicly reported how much money was raised or how it was spent. Not a word. Meanwhile other organizations were conducting audits paying for their own gas, and giving of their time with no “Donate” button.

The final blow – rather then help, they have set back Election Integrity by months

The Wave Liberty Tree folks required volunteers to sign confidentiality agreements not to reveal any information gained from audit counts. The reason? To protect County Clerks and in the interest of forming a trustworthy relationship. Well, it seems that backfired as well.

A source outside Wave/Liberty Tree has discovered that incompetence has permanently damaged the relationship of county clerks regarding Open Records requests:

A clerk said that there have been a number of clerks who’ve complained about the fact that the WAVE will actually schedule dates to come in and then they simply do not show up. According to this clerk, they’ve done this in at last three counties that she knows of. And apparently, in a couple of those situations, they’ve called back to reschedule and have then failed to show up for the rescheduled date. In at least one instance, because the County Clerk knew the count was going to be so big and she wanted to prepare for it, she had two of her staffers cancel their vacations, only to have WAVE not show up.

Outagamie County was alleged to have taken over 8 days and the Clerk there indicated that she regretted having cooperated with them.

Stop The Secrecy

It is time for Wave/Liberty Tree to come forth with any findings of anomalies in the June 5 Recall Election and make them public. They owe the hundreds of volunteers who are working outside their veil of secrecy an accounting for their fund raising efforts.

Three Books About Vote Stealing Crooks

Florida 2000

Many people in the country and world were riveted to the news events following the recount of the 2000 Presidential vote in Florida which resulted in the most controversial ruling of the Supreme Court. Bush v. Gore, is the United States Supreme Court decision that effectively resolved the dispute surrounding the 2000 presidential election in favor of George W. Bush.

The hanging chads and lost votes became the stuff of late night TV jokes and stabs and reduced the integrity of our elections to be no better, and perhaps, even much worse than those in third world countries.

Ohio 2004

Just when we were assured that the advent of electronic voting machines had solved the problem there came 2004 and indisputable evidence in Ohio. The election had been stolen. In fact, Kerry won Ohio, and this time, the election had been stolen by the same electronic machines that were to be the fail-safe to Bush’s 2000 stolen election.

No Longer a Conspiracy Theory

The peculiar nature of election integrity is that it only reaches the threshold of notice periodically, after an election cycle, much like a person who suffers an ailment like acne or gout a victim really doesn’t think about it much when it is not flaring up and exhibiting painful symptoms. This peculiar periodic nature of election integrity allows it to go dormant and remain untreated like a malignant cancer. The nature of most humans is to grease the squeaky wheel and busy themselves with the million other things like raising children and making living, during the times when the wheel turns freely.

As the masses of people lose focus on the hidden malignancy, it is left in the hands of the investigative media to break the news, but as the whole landscape of news reporting has shifted from two or three venue sources to hundreds and thousands, the dormant election integrity issues have been left at the bottom of the stack of newsworthy projects. It seems the most expedient way to treat these pesky election machine problems has been to dismiss them as conspiracy theories shared by a few attention seeking activists who have nothing better to do than pour over spread sheets of election results.

The Historic Wisconsin Election Research Lab

I don’t know what it is about the people of Wisconsin in that they have brewed up many of the most controversial movements of the past two centuries such as the rise of the Progressive Movement of Fighting Bob La Follette and the witch hunt of Joe McCarthy.

Well, Wisconsin has done it again. Probably because of the historical number of state wide elections in the past 18 months, the acne, the gout, the cancer of election fraud has exhibited its oozy symptoms repeatedly beginning with the Supreme Court election in the Spring of 2011 and ending with the June 5 Recall election of 2012. Wisconsin has become the focal point for the research, recount, and resurgence to expose the unexplainable anomalies and breakdowns in all of these elections with document after document of statistically impossible vote totals, mis-dated poll tapes – split, ripped and torn vote bags, and a hundred other gout throbbing, pimple pushing, tumor raising symptoms of a dying or dead vote tabulation system.

What’s in it for You?

You now can be privy to all the dreaded cancer that is choking your freedom, without having to drive the hundreds of miles to a recount or audit, without blinding yourself while pouring over pages and pages of vote tabulation spread sheets, without issuing a open records request to your county clerk and hiring a legal team to enforce it. You need do none of this. Whew!

All of the major findings of all this long and involved work are presented to you in three books. I have spent well over $300 in gas alone to drive to audits, recounts, and open records meetings with county clerks. You can own all three important works for under $60!

Here They Are! Such a Deal!

While We Still Have Time
Sheila Parks, Ed. D.

Wisconsin Democracy in Our Hands

“I cannot watch enough videos of the people in Wisconsin as you bold, brave, most decent Wisconsinites are out in the streets – resisting, doing non-violent civil disobedience/direct action, dissenting, protesting, rising up, standing up to and speaking and singing truth to power…”

This book deals with how we are losing our votes because of the fraud of electronic voting machines. While We Still Have Time, we must now stop using all electronic voting machines in our elections and instead now move to publicly observed, secure hand-counted paper ballots(HCPB) elections.
Get the book now on Amazon

Steal This Book, Not My Vote
Barbara With

Now available as a PDF eBook
for only $4.97.

This PDF has links to over 100 videos, news stories and blogs that support the evidence of a hostile corporate takeover of our state, and includes my RICO complaint filed with the US Department of Justice in August 2011.

Based on my experiences on the front lines of Wisconsin government for the past 18 months, as well as contributions from members of the Wisconsin Citizens Media Coop, STEAL tells the true story behind the story of the takeover of the United States as it is playing out in Wisconsin, and what we can do to stand strong for democracy.

Get the e book. NOW!

Proving Election Fraud
Richard Charnin

The media immediately rejected the exit polls that showed Kerry winning. After all, they said, Bush had a three million vote “mandate”; a massive conspiracy to fix the election could not be kept secret. Of course, we later learned that the vote counts could have been the work of a handful of individuals. Read “Proving Election Fraud” NOW

Save your vote. Get the facts. November is destined to present historical anomalies. Know what to watch for.

The Pesky Poll Tape

This video below has been view 3,103 times, and is now referred to by election integrity folks in Wisconsin as “that old poll tape video”. It speaks for itself as to a question that was never answered. A poll tape was found in the Spring Supreme Court election recount that was dated days BEFORE the election…and was counted!

The testimony is from Barb With, author of the book: “Steal This Book, Not My Vote”.

Walker Wins RECALL SCRATCH OFF

Wisconsin Lottery Takes Over Election Administration

An improbable occurrence of duplicate “math tags” were found in the Government Accountability Board canvas of the June 5 Recall Election. A “math tag” is like a computer program saying “You’re IT!”, in a game of tag. You see, programmers may lie, but numbers don’t. When a programmer at Command Central voting vender corporation starts futzing with programing by such tricks as flipping every 10th vote, or applying any other manipulation of the vote count, these darn math tags pop up. Numbers want to tell the truth that is denied by the manipulation of programing. These corrections show up as an unusual instance of “matched numbers” in the vote tally.

But look for yourself. The scratch ticket below reveals the actual final canvas of the GAB for wards in Fond Du Lac County. If you look at the purple scratch off lines you can clearly see that the number “396” is the winner!


Note: All of the research in this post has nothing to do with the “Wave” audit, since they do not share or publicize any of the results. They give no help or aid to any other researcher or organization and do not account for their on-going fund raising efforts.
Read “The Wave’s John Doe Investigation”

“396” shows up three times

Numbers are more non partisan than the PBS news, so “yes” there can be a predetermined result whether the winner is blue or red – the candidate with the number match does not mean that candidate rigged the election – it is just that the numbers will find anyway to bring truth to the tally regardless of which column needs to be altered.

The more “math tags”,like duplicate numbers, that show up, the greater the chances are that the numbers are straining beyond probability to tell the truth. Numbers will do anything to make things right, even arrive at “396” three times in one county.

Math tags – Math tags everywhere

Below are some duplicate numbers from the official GAB canvas for Columbia County the City of Portage:

Columbia County >>>>>>>>>>>>>BARRETT >>>>>>>>WALKER
CITY OF PORTAGE Wards 1,9,10- >>685 – >>>>>>>>>>484
CITY OF PORTAGE Wards 2,3,5 – >>678 – >>>>>>>>>>436
CITY OF PORTAGE Wards 4,6,7,8- >662 – >>>>>>>>>>436
(All reporting units in Portage)

So, What are the chances in this “scratch off lottery”

We best turn to the work of Richard Charnin, the spread sheet wizard, for an answer. He compared the probability to a classic model of the likelihood of people in a room having the same birth date like this: There are 25 people in a room. The probability that at least 2 have the same birthday (365 days) is approximately 56%. Ok but we are looking at the probability of duplicate numbers showing up in a vote count.

Richard Charnin: “Here are the birthday(vote) match probabilities assuming 23 people in a room (or 23 wards): Probability (no match) =.493, p(1 match)= .363, p(2)=.111, p(3) =.018, p(4 or more) =.015. The probability of three wards in Fond du Lac having exactly the same number (396) of votes is p(2) = 11.1%”

Richard Charnin’s duplicate number probability spread sheet

More “math tags” in Chippewa County in the City of Chippewa Falls

In the research below prepared by Marrianne Moonhouse please notice that the duplicate “math tags” not only show up in the “Barret” total but in the “Triveldi” total and the “Scattered”(votes for all others) total as well.

CHIPPEWA COUNTY CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS

WARD – TOTAL – Walker – BARRETT – TRIVEDI – Scatter

Ward 1- 735 – 381 – 338 – 15 – 1

Ward 2 – 768 – 395 – 365 – 7 – 1

Ward 3 – 955 – 471 – 476 – 8 – 0

Ward 4 – 651 – 311 – 323 – 17 – 0

Ward 5 – 592 – 267 – 312 – 12 – 1

Ward 6 – 642 – 317 – 312 – 12 – 1

Ward 7 – 705 – 355 – 344 – 6 – 0

The weird “math tag” was only the beginning of the problems with the vote tabulation the Leinenkugel beer country of Chippewa County. For some reason the municipal level election totals were not reported until days after the election when they finally showed up in the GAB “certification”. These totals suggest 142 “under votes” in the Governor’s race, meaning that 142 people who showed up on election day did NOT vote in the lead race.

“Math tags”, Under votes, Secret Audits, Secret Programing

Perhaps it is way too late for the Wisconsin Lottery and the GAB to switch functions before the November Presidential Election. Too Bad. At least the scratch off and machine draw are 100 times more transparent and secure than anything vote machine vending corporations like Command Central or ES&S have to offer. Or maybe the Wisconsin Lottery can devise a scratch off card to replace the ballot in the November election with a side prize of a million dollars for one lucky voter. All things considered, this scheme would not be much less secure or statistically correct than the secret programming provided by covert private corporations and administered though insecure data systems like electronic voting machines.

Welcome to the Wisconsin Vottery